06 october - - - ~ "They want responsibility in a culture that abdicates it." | redgreenandblue.org/2011/10/05/cop… if you are a scientist look at who's financing you | "Brainstorm" there is a gap of conscience, those who invent & those who assign are of different understanding those who live within complex thought structures got there because of their ability to move in dangerous realms, they're able to be cautious those who finance them live in different realms, they know different sort of responsibility, it's the makability realm, not survival danger scientists are lured into an easier way to finance themselves, their work & the pursuit of their interests, but they source their responsibility & they don't realise it they don't realise it, cause it is currently a usual thought, that "everyone is as i am & everyone thinks as i think" this conclusion is irreal, it is a presumptious illusion, based on the wish for simplicity of things real is that different societal coherence offers different possibilities to learn & to move (urge) scientists brains are wired completely different than bankers brains to assume that the common human base if preventing us from dangers of incompatibility of decisions is not enough regarding the ability we posses meantime to acidify oceans, cut mountains, polute earth, produce virusses, free energy by splitting atoms just because we can do something means not that it is wise to do so the presence of something justifies it only within the space of paternalism the more able we are to extent the given existence & its possibilities for us to act & move, the more we leave the security of dependence to be independent means to be self reliant & that freedom comes with the burden of responsibility if we yearn for freedom then we have to carry the ressponsibility, any other way leads to destruction the responsibility of scientists is a different one than the responsibility of bankers responsibility cannot be outsourced without drawback on freedom either we are able to restrain ourselves by reason or we will be restrained by the outcomes of our doings just & only our ability to face, deal with & solve problems can save us from the harm of elaborate problems generated by complex procedures but ability never comes with outsourced responsibility, outsourced engagement & outsourced commitment responsibility, engagement & commitment are the base for ability, they are the result of ability value for the acting & aiming person no responsibility means no ability means no value means loss & failure instead of success, just simple as that there is a thin margin of tolerance, whithin you can make some profit, but it will come tumbling down, it's the question of WHEN, not IF till now we lived within the overall tolerance margin, we are leaving it now, the "payment day" comes upon us, the things tumble why do people use violence at all ? cause it's simpler, it seems at least at the time of the decision, simpler than to care for more action, for learning, for different action violence is more of that which we already can do, it is the linear thinking of quantity the flaw of the linear thinking of quantity is the disregard of or even more often, simply skipping the fact of destruction of fragile reality structures by doing just more of the same which worked so wonderly before we take reality, existence, life, function, results for granted, that's the naive entrance into paternalism & we have not even a clue about CarrieHFletcher Carrie Hope Fletcher by reflectingarea Tweeting 'RIP Steve Jobs' on my Apple Mac seems quite appropriate. An absolute genius who helped push the human race forward. - - - - - - - - - CarrieHFletcher Carrie Hope Fletcher by reflectingarea Tweeting 'RIP Steve Jobs' on my Apple Mac seems quite appropriate. An absolute genius who helped push the human race forward. 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra we take reality, existence, life, function, results for granted, that's the naive entrance into paternalism & we have not even a clue about 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra simply skipping the fact of destruction of fragile reality structures by doing just more of the same which worked so wonderly before 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra the flaw of the linear thinking of quantity is the disregard of or even more often, 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra violence is more of that which we already can do, it is the linear thinking of quantity 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra cause it's simpler, it seems at least at the time of the decision, simpler than to care for more action, for learning, for different action 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra why do people use violence at all ? 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra till now we lived within the overall tolerance margin, we are leaving it now, the "payment day" comes upon us, the things tumble 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra there is a thin margin of tolerance, whithin you can make some profit, but it will come tumbling down, it's the question of WHEN, not IF 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra no responsibility means no ability means no value means loss & failure instead of success, just simple as that 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra responsibility, engagement & commitment are the base for ability, they are the result of ability value for the acting & aiming person 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra but ability never comes with outsourced responsibility, outsourced engagement & outsourced commitment 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra just & only our ability to face, deal with & solve problems can save us from the harm of elaborate problems generated by complex procedures 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra either we are able to restrain ourselves by reason or we will be restrained by the outcomes of our doings 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra responsibility cannot be outsourced without drawback on freedom 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra the responsibility of scientists is a different one than the responsibility of bankers 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra if we yearn for freedom then we have to carry the ressponsibility, any other way leads to destruction 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra to be independent means to be self reliant & that freedom comes with the burden of responsibility 6 Oct » reflectingarea Ra the more able we are to extent the given existence & its possibilities for us to act & move, the more we leave the security of dependence 6 Oct Favorite Reply Delete reflectingarea Ra the presence of something justifies it only within the space of paternalism 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra just because we can do something means not that it is wise to do so 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra regarding the ability we posses meantime to acidify oceans, cut mountains, polute earth, produce virusses, free energy by splitting atoms 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra to assume that the common human base if preventing us from dangers of incompatibility of decisions is not enough 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra scientists brains are wired completely different than bankers brains 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra real is that different societal coherence offers different possibilities to learn & to move (urge) 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra this conclusion is irreal, it is a presumptious illusion, based on the wish for simplicity of things 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra they don't realise it, cause it is currently a usual thought, that "everyone is as i am & everyone thinks as i think" 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra they source their responsibility & they don't realise it 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra scientists are lured into an easier way to finance themselves, their work & the pursuit of their interests, but 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra those who finance them live in different realms, they know different sort of responsibility, it's the makability realm, not survival danger 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra those who live within complex thought structures got there because of their ability to move in dangerous realms, they're able to be cautious 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra there is a gap of conscience, those who invent & those who assign are of different understanding 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra if you are a scientist look at who's financing you | "Brainstorm" 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra "They want responsibility in a culture that abdicates it." | redgreenandblue.org/2011/10/05/cop… 6 Oct reflectingarea Ra ~ 6 Oct